...A. Jadczyk2#2
 e-mail: ajad@physik.uni-bielefeld.de
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...not-to-be).
Calling observables observables can be, however, justified in the event-enhanced formalism that we are outlining here.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...bodies.
A similar evolutionary view of Nature is pursued in a recent series of papers by R. Haag [9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. According to this view the Future does not yet exist and is being continuously created, this creation being marked by events. That view parallels ours, but we are more open towards a "dynamical many worlds algorithm" - cf. [14, 15] and references therein
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...position.
Note that here, as in the nonrelativistic case, we assume that g depends only on x and not on t - in the coordinate system with respect the detector is at rest.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...causes.
More than thirty years later time travel is in the field of active research of NASA - cf. http://www.lerc.nasa.gov/WWW/bpp/
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Converted to HTML by Robert Coquereaux

Tue Dec 29 10:54:13 WET 1998